Forces Working Against the Growth of Humanity

Defining The Forces Working Against the Growth of Humanity

The purpose of this article is to identify and explain the forces working against the growth of humanity in the modern world. Before doing this, it is essential to establish what the growth of humanity actually means. For the purpose of this exploration, the growth of humanity will be defined as an overall increase in the total number of human beings.

It can be argued that population growth is not the only thing that constitutes the growth of humanity. However, humanity, by definition, is the collection of all human beings. Therefore, the only way for humanity to grow is for that collection to increase over time. If the total number of humans were to go to zero, humanity would completely lose its ability to grow.

Some may argue that technological or cultural advancements also constitute the growth of humanity. However, this is where the conversation can become entangled in semantics. After all, if a new technological or cultural advancement ultimately lowers the human population, can it truly be considered an advancement? To avoid these debates, I will adhere to the stated base definition of growth: an increase in the total number of human beings.

It is also worth noting that many of the forces discussed in this article not only hinder human population growth but also dampen the generation of new knowledge. This is detrimental, because new knowledge is what has enabled human population growth over time and underpinned every technological advancement we’ve ever achieved. The prevailing trend throughout human history has been one of exponential population growth. Yes, there have been occasional periods of decline, but these have always been mere speed bumps in an otherwise upwards trajectory.

As humanity has increased in population and collective knowledge over time, we have become more powerful. This newfound power grants us the ability to shape the forces that most effect our population growth. Every single force in this article is a force created by or associated with mankind. It makes great sense that, in conquering the forces of nature once holding back our growth, we have created new ones, equally problematic for growth.

All of the forces discussed in this article share one fundamental trait: they diminish the likelihood of individuals to reproduce and start families within their reproductive years. This leads to a decline in birth rates, the most essential factor in population growth. Therefore, the forces in this article collectively work to decrease the human population over time.

The Forces Working Against the Growth Of Humanity

In order to truly explore the forces working against the growth of humanity, it is helpful to personify them. Personification allows for deep understanding and recognition of interconnectedness. The forces we will be exploring are as follows:

Digital Forces

The digital technologies in existence today are some of the most powerful forces that humanity has ever grappled with. As we move forward, an increasing amount of human time and energy is being dedicated to interacting with platforms that are built in the digital space.

These digital technologies have major impacts on birth rate and population growth. Since they are so powerful, this section is dedicated to exploring the ones that are hindering the previously defined growth of humanity.

Hollywood

Hollywood is the entertainment hub of the United States, the most dominant global power in recent times. As the cultural engine of the the American empire, Hollywood produces a variety of entertainment, primarily films and television shows, consumed by billions of people worldwide. These visual creations play a pivotal role in shaping the culture of the United States and the rest of the world.

This degree of global influence from one entertainment superstructure is unprecedented in human history. Prior to the invention of television, people engaged with intricate narratives primarily through books, plays, and oral traditions. Today, in developed nations, the dominant platforms are television, film, and digital media. This concentration into digital forms of storytelling grants Hollywood significant power over societal culture, because individuals derive much of their cultural identity and values from narrative driven, human stories.

The fact that a single cultural hub has such monumental influence leaves a substantial portion of humanity vulnerable in the event of a tyrannical takeover or degeneration of said hub. It can be argued that this is exactly what has happened over the past several decades. Cultural forces that we will discuss later in this article such as LGBTQ+ and Feminism have played a significant role in shaping Hollywood’s direction. Countless movies and television shows now incorporate narratives tightly aligned with these ideologies.

Traditional Media

Traditional media refers to the established channels, platforms, and tools used for communication and dissemination of information to the public. These various channels play a pivotal role in the delivery of news, entertainment, education, and persuasive content. Individuals across all of society rely on these channels for important decisions like who to vote for in an election.

We are living in a transitional period where public attention is shifting from traditional forms of media like newspapers, magazines, radio, and television to digital forms of media like social media, websites, blogs, and streaming services. As this shift continues, traditional media organizations are degenerating at a rapid pace. It appears that many traditional media platforms have been captured by central powers and have become increasingly biased and politically driven.

Even as they degenerate, traditional forms of media continue to exert considerable influence over the United States and the Western world, particularly among older generations who rely on them for information and entertainment. These media forms are declining in attention and viewership, but they are causing significant harm to society as they fall.

It has become clear to anyone paying attention over the past several decades that both Traditional Media and Hollywood have been promoting cultural narratives that detriment the growth of humanity. We will discuss those cultural narratives further in later sections.

Social media is a an extremely powerful force in the modern world that has largely reshaped the way humans behave socially. With each subsequent generation adopting social media at younger ages, its influence grows stronger. This section will explore the ways in which social media suppresses the growth of humanity.

Social media platforms are deliberately designed to maximize human engagement, because they derive most of their revenue from selling user data and presenting users with advertisements. The greater the usage, the more data they can collect and the more advertisements they can show. To achieve this, social media companies invest heavily in making their platforms as habit-forming as possible. Unfortunately, this often results in a form of behavioral addiction, with individuals spending increasing amounts of time on digital platforms, engaged in passive consumption.

Excessive use of social media undermines people’s ability to form and maintain long-term relationships, as users are often rewarded with digital interactions rather than meaningful, face-to-face connections. The profound impact of social media on human behavior cannot be overstated. The human brain is inherently wired to seek social rewards. With digital social media platforms, individuals encounter social rewards in a form quite alien to the human mind. These rewards activate the same systems meant to encourage successful in-person interactions. This is one of the main mechanisms through which social media platforms arguably detriment the growth of humanity. By providing the brain with micro social rewards, they satisfy brain systems designed for in-person connection, leading to diminished motivation for real-world interactions.

Additionally, social media creates an illusion of romantic success. For instance, women can receive significant attention from men online, giving them a sense of fulfilling the actions needed to attract a partner. Through posts and digital attention, they satisfy their reward systems that drive mate-seeking behavior. However, the vast majority of this digital attention does not result in meaningful real-world connections. The brain experiences rewards disconnected from actual progress toward its intended goals. This phenomenon is particularly concerning for younger individuals who lack a mature understanding of social dynamics, leaving them vulnerable to the illusionary rewards of social media.

Another significant issue with social media is its extreme centralization. A few dominant platforms capture the vast majority of social media-related traffic and a large share of global internet traffic. This consolidation gives these companies immense global power over human interaction. In addition, they monopolize the flow of money and data through their platforms and employ strategies to stifle the emergence of new competitors.

Digital technologies now permeate nearly all aspects of human social engagement, from connecting with friends to building professional networks and finding romantic partners. Previously, these activities were decentralized, with little to no middle men. Today, digital companies have positioned themselves as intermediaries in all of these areas, driven primarily by profit motives. In their current centralized, profit-focused state, these forces are detrimenting the growth of humanity by disrupting the social processes that are essential for social success and the formation of new families.

Video Games

Video games are among the most powerful digital forces influencing the male youth of humanity. They operate on computer code, creating virtual environments accessible from nearly anywhere. The majority of video game players are men, a pattern rooted in evolutionary predispositions. Men are naturally inclined toward competitive activities, particularly those involving physicality and conflict, which aligns with the violent aspects of many video games. These games redirect men’s innate competitive drives into digital space.

To understand why this poses a challenge to humanity’s growth, one must only consider what playing video games entails. Video games require players to interact with virtual environments through controllers or keyboards while seated, often for extended periods. This sedentary activity detriments physical health. Additionally, video games are almost always played indoors, limiting exposure to the natural environment that humans evolved in, which exacerbates various health problems.

Video games are designed to be highly mentally rewarding, similar to social media. Developers create fast-paced games with rapid rewards, making them more stimulating than many aspects of everyday life. This demotivates young individuals, particularly adolescent males, who are still in critical stages of mental development. Early exposure to rewards in virtual environments fosters a detachment from real-life pursuits, leading young males to become accustomed to the potent digital game environments while neglecting essential aspects of their lives. This phenomenon mirrors the effects of addictive substances, where excessive rewards diminish interest in less immediate and potent stimuli. For example, it may take only a few weeks or months to become a high ranking player in a particular video game, while in the real world, it usually takes many years to reach a prominent status in any given human field. Video games speed up rewards and offer rapid feedback, much faster than the real world can offer.

Social networks tied to video games add another layer of complexity. Players often connect with friends or meet others through these platforms, creating digital social circles. Quitting the game can feel like severing ties with these networks, compelling individuals to continue playing. While these networks offer a semblance of social interaction, they often lack the depth of real-life connections. Specifically, most video game spaces are two dimensional and do not offer you the ability to see other players faces. Furthermore, many of these video game environments are largely devoid of female presence, failing to equip men with the social skills necessary for navigating complex, real-world, dual sex environments. This effect is exacerbating the increasing number of young single individuals in the Western world.

Proficiency in real-world social environments is essential for long-term success, including forming cohesive family units. Video games consume countless hours that could otherwise be spent building social skills to prepare for adulthood. Increasingly, adolescents are struggling with “failure to launch” as they transition into adulthood, partly because they lack the social skills and ambition that they should have developed during childhood and adolescence. Excessive time spent on video games, rather than engaging in meaningful, real-world interactions, is a significant contributing factor. For these reasons, video games can be considered a force working against the growth of humanity.

Pornography

Pornography has become a highly influential digital force in the modern world. Anyone with an internet connection can access a virtually infinite number of pornographic videos, with sites like PornHub receiving hundreds of millions of visits daily. The impact of pornography on human development is profound, particularly in how it hijacks the innate male drive for sex and reproduction.

Over millions of years, males evolved a strong sex drive to ensure reproductive success. Pornography simulates sexual activity, triggering the release of a pleasurable cocktail of neurotransmitters that the brain associates with sexual encounters. This artificial stimulation, especially when introduced at a young age, is reshaping the minds of men worldwide. Digital porn satisfies, sedates, and rewires the mental systems designed to motivate men toward real life sexual interactions with real partners. These are the sexual interactions that humanity relies on to continue its growth.

Engaging in real-life sexual relationships is a complex process involving social navigation and courtship, traditionally driven by strong psychological incentives. The mass proliferation of pornography redirects these drives into artificial digital environments. Achieving sexual satisfaction in this environment requires almost no effort—merely accessing a website and selecting content. This bypasses the entire learning process and all of the effort required for real-world sexual interactions, outsourcing men’s sexual experiences to digital recordings of sexual performers. The internet porn market incentivizes people to record themselves engaging in sexual acts by rewarding them with attention and money. These incentives are powerful given that the porn industry is a nearly billion dollar industry.

Many men are facing significant struggles with addiction to digital pornography. They recognize its negative effects yet find it challenging to break free due to its strong influence on their psychological wiring. For many men in the modern world, their first experience with sexual stimuli involves passively viewing videos of people they will never meet, having performative sex. These early experiences carve out erotic memories that will linger throughout their lives, carving out indefinite reward pathways in their mind for digital porn.

The sheer scale and psychological influence of the porn industry makes it one of the most dangerous forces detrimenting the growth of humanity. Of the digital forces we’ve explored, it is likely the most habit-forming and addictive. By drastically disrupting biological systems designed for successful mating, it drives down the number of successful romantic relationships and as a consequence, birth rates.

Cultural and Ideological Forces

Cultural and ideological forces have had a major impact on the growth of humanity for as long as human civilization has been around. To illustrate the level of impact: in the twentieth century alone, communism, an economic ideology, resulted in the deaths of an estimated eighty to one hundred million people. Cultural and ideological forces deeply shape the trajectory of human population. This section will explore some of the predominant ideologies in the modern world that are hindering the growth of humanity, with a particular focus on their impact in the modern Western world.

LGBTQ+

LGBTQ+ is one of the most controversial ideologies of the modern day. It emphasizes inclusion, acceptance, and visibility for all individuals, regardless of how they identify. To determine whether or not it is a force working against the growth of humanity, we must explore the ideas that it promotes.

All groups within the LGBTQ+ spectrum deviate from traditional societal norms regarding sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Many of the groups included do not conform to the idea that heterosexuality is the default mode of sexual orientation in humans. Some of the groups do not even conform to the idea that everyone’s gender identity aligns with their birth-assigned sex. The reason why these two beliefs work against the growth of humanity is because individuals that are not sexually attracted to a gender they can procreate with are less likely to reproduce. Some of the groups in the LGBTQ+ ideology identify as not even being sexually attracted to other people. The chance of these individuals reproducing is near zero.

In addition, many of the groups within the LGBTQ+ community share an understanding of identity as fluid rather than fixed. Whether in terms of sexual orientation or gender identity, these groups insist that human experiences of gender and attraction exist on a spectrum rather than within clear categories. This idea goes against much of the knowledge that we have about identity and human psychology. Identity is not a purely fluid force that can be changed at will. In order for someone to change their identity, they require a degree of social consensus. The LGBTQ+ ideology works to shape the community into one that accepts and even enforces gender identifications, regardless of logic or empirical truth.

This ideology has infiltrated many private and government organizations which have been recently promoting the use of gender pronouns. This pronoun practice is already leading to much confusion, especially among younger individuals. The percentage of young individuals questioning or identifying differently from their assigned gender at birth has increased significantly over the past decade. In the United States, the percentage of individuals under age thirty that now identify as transgender or nonbinary is significantly higher than the percentage of individuals of older age groups that identify as transgender or nonbinary. This drastic change is undoubtably a consequence of the increased spread of the LGBTQ+ ideology.

One of the most sinister aspects of the ideology is the associative use of puberty blockers. Puberty blockers are medications used to delay the onset of puberty in adolescents. They are most commonly prescribed to children experiencing gender dysphoria—a supposed condition where there is a conflict between a person’s physical gender and the gender with which they identify. Another practice driven by the LGBTQ+ ideology is gender-affirming surgery. This refers to a variety of surgical procedures that aim to align an individual’s physical appearance with their gender identity. These surgeries, which are often performed on young individuals, drastically decrease if not eliminate the possibility of them ever having children. This component of the LGBTQ+ ideology most clearly leads to a decrease in the growth of humanity through its high rate of rendering individuals permanently infertile.

The influence of the LGBTQ+ ideology on birth rates, and sexual confusion, driven by the ideas it promotes, easily qualify it as a force working against the growth of humanity. Almost every idea that it encapsulates, if adopted, leads to an increased or total reduction in the ability of individuals to procreate.

Climate Change Extremism

Elon Musk says it best: while climate change is a serious problem that demands attention, viewing humans as a “blight on the planet” or believing human existence itself harms Earth is both dangerous and counterproductive. Unfortunately, this perspective is fairly common among passionate climate activists, with some even choosing not to have children as a way to “protect the Earth.”

Climate change extremism is working against the growth of humanity because such growth relies on expansion and increased energy infrastructure. Under the lens of extreme climate ideology, these necessary actions are labeled as destructive to the planet. Many within this ideology advocate halting expansion and curbing the use of traditional energy sources, despite humanity’s current reliance on them and the absence of viable immediate replacements.

Extreme climate activists often push for large-scale government overhauls of the energy sector, reallocating resources toward “sustainable” energy forms. This shift away from free-market economics frequently accompanies criticism of capitalism as harmful to the planet. Ambitious government and corporate goals, such as achieving carbon neutrality, have led to significant market inefficiencies. Government-subsidized clean energy projects are often expensive and inefficient, incentivizing private companies to pursue technologies that would not be viable in a purely free market.

The consequences of climate extremism are twofold. First, the ideology leads individuals to view humanity as a destructive force, discouraging them from having children and influencing others to adopt similar beliefs. This anti-growth mindset undermines the expansion necessary for humanity’s growth. Second, centralized entities exploit climate extremism as a control mechanism. Governments impose subsidies and mandates for clean energy, distorting markets, while private companies capitalize on these policies for profit, often at the expense of efficiency and effectiveness. These dynamics weaken energy markets, drive up costs, inflate government spending, and ultimately burden everyday people striving to support families. For these reasons, climate change extremism is a force working against the growth of humanity.

DEI and Identity Politics

DEI and Identity Politics are two forces that operate by dividing individuals based on characteristics that they have little to no control over. The forces lay out a framework for finding “oppressed individuals or groups” and attempting to balance inequalities through centralized control.

DEI

The concept of DEI is fundamentally anti-meritocratic. Rather than rewarding individuals solely based on abilities and talent, DEI prioritizes diversity, equity, and inclusion. This framework has gained significant traction across organizations in the Western world, including businesses, educational institutions, and governments.

The first component of DEI is diversity. This component focuses on ensuring representation of varied identities, such as race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, disability, and age. Implicit in this idea is the belief that meritocracy alone cannot adequately foster diversity, necessitating intervention by central powers to promote it. Consequently, organizations increasingly prioritize demographic factors over skills and abilities, often resulting in reduced organizational effectiveness.

Equity, the second component of DEI, differs from equality. While equality treats all individuals as equal, equity considers different circumstances and allocates resources to achieve what are considered fair outcomes. This principle parallels concepts from communistic ideologies, such as Karl Marx’s assertion: “From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs.” Equality of outcome is a concept that causes tremendous detriment to the growth of humanity by stifling markets and penalizing outstanding individuals that contribute more than others.

Inclusion, the final element, aims to create environments where individuals from underrepresented groups feel valued and integrated. This is perhaps the most ambiguous of the concepts within DEI. It involves altering organizational cultures, such as encouraging gender pronoun usage. Such measures have led to much confusion, particularly among impressionable adolescents, where increased focus on pronouns correlates with heightened gender identity questioning.

In practice, DEI initiatives hinder societal and organizational growth by fostering inefficiencies, confusion, and division. By prioritizing identity-based criteria over merit, DEI compromises productivity and innovation, creating major challenges for the growth of humanity.

Identity Politics

Identity politics encompasses political and social movements that center on the concerns of specific social groups, often defined by characteristics such as race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, or disability. Movements like Black Lives Matter, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and Feminism frequently operate within this framework. A central component of identity politics is group identity, which emphasizes the shared experiences, struggles, and perspectives of particular social groups. Advocates argue that these lived experiences provide unique insights into societal issues and systemic power dynamics.

Identity politics often seeks to challenge structures favoring dominant groups, such as white, male, heterosexual, or able-bodied individuals, to achieve greater equity and representation. Intersectionality, introduced by scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw, plays a pivotal role in this discourse by highlighting how overlapping aspects of identity create compounded forms of privilege or oppression. Many identity politics movements aim to increase marginalized groups’ representation in decision-making spaces across government, business, and media.

These movements are also used as tools by politicians to segment populations into distinct groups, galvanizing support while fostering division. This strategy involves labeling individuals based on identity categories and advocating policies that prioritize representation over broader societal cohesion.

Identity politics and DEI hinder societal growth by promoting division, centralizing power, and undermining free market efficiency by directly disrupting meritocratic systems and structures. They incentivize individuals to leverage fixed traits such as gender or race to achieve economic success instead of incentivizing them to develop skills and competency. For all of the reasons discussed, Identity Politics and DEI can be seen as forces working against the growth of humanity.

Feminism

Feminism is a social, political, and cultural movement advocating for the rights of women to achieve equality with men in political, social, and economic realms. Equality refers to the state of being equal in status, rights, and opportunities. However, as feminism has significantly advanced its goals for equality, it has increasingly shifted its focus towards striving for equality of outcome. Over the past century, feminism has had a profound impact on the United States and the entire Western world.

In the United States, women are now educated at unprecedented rates. In the early nineteen hundreds, women comprised a small minority of college students; today, they represent the majority of college enrollment. Women have also become a major force in labor markets, with participation rising from only a small minority of women in the early twentieth century to the majority of women today. In terms of earnings, women have made remarkable progress: in 1930, women as a whole earned about 30% of what men earned, compared to roughly 82% today [1]. While these changes appear promising on paper, especially if one believes women should achieve the same economic outcomes as men, a deeper look reveals many detrimental side effects.

The question arises: why should women aim for identical outcomes as men, given their differing biology and social roles throughout human history? Men and women have always navigated the sexual world from different perspectives, evolving different traits to fulfill differing roles. Men evolved traits for competing for access to women, while women evolved traits for attracting suitable men and caring for offspring. The past century’s rapid shifts in women’s societal roles have created significant social and cultural challenges.

It is important to note that not all of the following negative outcomes can be attributed solely to feminism, but it has certainly played a significant role in the following changes. In 1920, the marriage rate peaked at 12.0 marriages per 1,000 people in the United States [2]. In 2022 the marriage rate declined to 6.0 marriages per 1,000 people, representing a 50% decrease from 1920 [3]. Women now initiate the vast majority of divorces, often linked to their increased financial independence. The dating landscape has also shifted dramatically. According to a 2020 Pew Research Center survey, 63% of single men reported difficulty finding someone to date [4]. Women are also reporting difficulty finding suitable partners due to their increased economic status.

Sexlessness is also on the rise. Research indicates that the percentage of Americans reporting no sexual activity has risen significantly in recent times. For instance, a study analyzing data from the General Social Survey found that the share of men aged 18 to 24 experiencing no sexual inactivity increased from 18.9% between 2000 and 2002 to 30.9% between 2016 and 2018 [5]. This fuels declining birth rates. In the United States, the birth rate has been falling almost continuously since 2007, with births down by 18% [6].

To understand feminism’s influence on these outcomes, it is essential to examine the mating strategies of men and women. Men prioritize youth and physical attractiveness in partners due to their association with fertility, while women prioritize resources, stability, and status to enhance offspring survival. This phenomenon, termed hypergamy, leads women to seek partners across or above status hierarchies. Consequently, men often engage in risk-taking and competitive behaviors to display resources and status, thereby attracting higher-quality mates.

The modern paradigm poses many problems regarding these strategies. Educated and career-focused women struggle to attract suitable partners of higher status, while the historical male strategy of risk-taking and competitive behavior is often not rewarded in modern centralized education. Due to this, many men face difficulties finding women who consider them of adequate mate quality. This imbalance contributes to declines in relationships, sexual activity, marriage, and birth rates. While Feminism has inarguably contributed some advancements that have been beneficial for humanity’s growth, it has also precipitated outcomes that are perniciously working against the growth of humanity. This has become especially true as it has shifted its goal from equality to trying to ensure almost identical economic and social roles for men and women.

Biological Forces

A central theme of this article is that the forces working against the growth of humanity interconnect and reinforce one another. As we delve deeper into these forces, their intricate connections become increasingly apparent. For instance, we previously discussed the LGBTQ+ ideology, which was classified as a cultural or ideological force. Yet, it also draws upon biological technologies, which we will explore. These overlapping connections across distinct categories highlight the deeply intertwined nature of all of the forces working against the growth of humanity.

Birth Control

Birth control is a complex modern biological technology that has profoundly shaped human civilization. Its impact is most pronounced in developed countries like the United States, where its use is widespread. Approximately 65-70% of sexually active individuals (both men and women) in the United States utilize some form of contraception, including methods like condoms, birth control pills, IUDs, sterilization, and other alternatives [7]. Let’s briefly examine these various forms of birth control.

Oral contraceptive pills are among the most commonly used forms of contraception. About 14% of women in their reproductive years in the United States use these pills, which contain sex hormones and are taken daily to prevent ovulation [8]. When used correctly, their effectiveness in preventing pregnancy is 99%. Another popular method is condoms, which are used at some point by almost all women in their reproductive years, often alongside other methods like oral contraceptives or IUDs. When used consistently and correctly, condoms are 98% effective.

LARCs (Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives) are another prevalent option in the United States. These devices are inserted or implanted into the body by healthcare providers. These implants last for years but can be removed to restore fertility. According to data from the National Survey of Family Growth for 2017–2019, approximately 10.4% of women aged in their reproductive years in the United States were using LARCs as their current method of contraception [9]. These are over 99% effective when used correctly.

Widespread access to highly effective birth control technology provides individuals with significant control over their chance of reproduction, a profound shift for humanity. Unsurprisingly, birth control has significantly contributed to declining birth rates in developed nations, particularly the United States. While the reasons for this are multifaceted, the most immediate factor is the ability to prevent pregnancies, which has altered the natural correlation between sexual activity and reproduction. Historically, the probability of sexual activity leading to pregnancy was much higher due to an absence of widespread contraception.

Over the last century, the development and distribution of birth control technologies to hundreds of millions worldwide has also coincided with cultural and ideological shifts. For instance, the Feminist movement gained much of its momentum in thanks to modern birth control, introduced in the mid-20th century. These technologies made it significantly easier for women to delay starting families and invest more time in economic competition. Moreover, couples today tend to have fewer children, leveraging birth control to regulate family size with precision.

Birth control, particularly hormonal methods, significantly affects the health of the women who use them. Hormonal contraceptives—including pills, IUDs, implants, injections, and patches—impact hormonal balance and, by extension, overall health. Potential side effects include headaches, mood changes, weight gain, increased risk of blood clots, and breast cancer. Additionally, hormonal birth control influences libido, with some women experiencing a decrease due to lower testosterone levels and others reporting an increase from reduced anxiety about unintended pregnancies. Mood and emotional well-being can also be affected, with some women experiencing heightened anxiety, depression, or mood swings, while others report exacerbation of pre-existing mental health conditions [10].

These physiological and psychological effects highlight the broader implications of birth control technologies on women and, by extension, all of human civilization. The foundation of human society is the creation of new generations, and without adequate reproduction, human civilization cannot persist. Birth control technology plays a substantial role in preventing pregnancies and driving down birth rates, making it a force that directly detriments the growth of humanity.

Abortion

Abortion is the medical process of ending a pregnancy, typically before the fetus can survive outside the womb. In the United States, an estimated six hundred thousand to nine hundred thousand abortions are performed annually [11]. Abortion remains a highly controversial topic, with ongoing debates about the extent of access and the scenarios in which it should be allowed.

An often-discussed aspect of the abortion debate is the “three exceptions” argument, which typically includes cases of rape, incest, or situations where the mother’s life is at risk. According to a 2004 study by the Guttmacher Institute, less than 10% of women cited the three exceptions as a reason for their abortion [12], indicating that the vast majority of abortions are performed for arguably non-essential reasons.

Hundreds of thousands of the abortions performed each year are not emergency or life-threatening cases. Over decades, this accumulates to millions of prevented births. When considering the entirety of the Western world, the numbers are exponentially greater. For these reasons, widespread access to abortion is a significant factor influencing the continued decline in birth rate in the United States and the Western world.

Processed Foods

Processed foods have become a staple of modern life due to their convenience, affordability, and long shelf life. However, they significantly impact humanity’s growth by contributing to deteriorating health among individuals and society as a whole. This decline in health directly affects reproductive health, a critical component of human vitality, and subsequently impacts birth rates. Furthermore, by compromising human health, processed foods influence the pair bonding process, as health and attractiveness are key factors when individuals seek partners.

Processed foods are often laden with added sugars, unhealthy fats, and high levels of sodium. These ingredients are linked to numerous health issues, including obesity, heart disease, high blood pressure, and type two diabetes. The processing of these foods frequently strips away essential nutrients like fiber, vitamins, and minerals, resulting in calorie-dense but nutrient-poor products that fail to provide the nourishment needed for optimal bodily function. Additionally, these foods are typically filled with artificial colors, flavors, and preservatives designed to enhance taste and extend shelf life, but these additives can have long-term health implications, such as hormonal imbalances or increased cancer risk.

The highly palatable combination of fats, sugars, and salt in processed foods often leads to overeating, as these foods lack the fiber and protein necessary to promote feelings of fullness. Diets dominated by processed foods can negatively impact the gut microbiome—the community of beneficial bacteria essential for digestion, immune function, and mental health.

These detrimental effects on health also impact reproductive health in several ways. Processed foods deprive the body of vital nutrients required for maintaining a healthy reproductive system. They often contain endocrine disruptors, which mimic or interfere with natural hormones, leading to imbalances that disrupt healthy reproductive cycles, particularly in women. The strong correlation between processed food consumption and obesity further harms reproductive systems in both men and women. Moreover, processed foods lack antioxidants critical for protecting reproductive cells and contribute to poor movement and sleep habits, further impacting overall health.

Beyond physical health, processed foods shape lifestyle behaviors that correlate with career-focused lifestyles and delayed childbearing. The convenience of processed foods enables individuals, particularly women, to dedicate more time to work and career advancement instead of maintaining traditional family roles. This trade-off comes at a societal cost. Processed foods diminish health and physical attractiveness, reducing attraction between sexes and decreasing pair bonding, which is essential for relationship formation and family building.

It is no surprise that developed countries with the highest access to highly processed foods also tend to experience low birth rates. The widespread reliance on processed foods has far-reaching detrimental consequences for the growth of humanity, influencing both the health of individuals and their reproductive behavior.

Chemicals and Endocrine Disruptors

Chemicals and endocrine disruptors are profoundly impacting human civilization. These are substances that interfere with the endocrine (hormone) system in animals, including humans. Hormones play a critical role in regulating human biological processes, especially reproduction, making endocrine disruptors particularly significant in their effects on fertility rates. Let’s examine some of the most common endocrine disruptors and their impact on humans.

One of the most prevalent endocrine disruptors in our modern environment is Bisphenol A (BPA). This industrial chemical is commonly found in food and beverage containers, metal can linings, receipts, dental materials, and other everyday products. BPA can leach into food and beverages from epoxy resin coatings, especially when heated. It mimics the hormone estrogen, binding to estrogen receptors in cells and interfering with normal hormonal signaling. This disruption can impact processes such as cell growth, differentiation, and reproduction. Exposure to BPA during pregnancy can also disrupt fetal development by interfering with natural estrogen signaling.

Another widespread endocrine disruptor is phthalates, which are used as plasticizers in PVC plastics and found in products like vinyl flooring, wall coverings, medical devices, personal care products (e.g., shampoos and soaps), and fragrances. Phthalates inhibit key enzymes involved in testosterone production, reducing testosterone synthesis. This disruption leads to decreased sperm count, reduced male fertility, and developmental issues in male fetuses.

Pesticides are another significant source of endocrine disruption. These chemicals, widely used in agriculture, often have structures similar to natural hormones, enabling them to bind to hormone receptors and mimic their effects. Pesticides can interfere with hormone synthesis or degradation, creating imbalances. Many disrupt estrogen and androgen receptors, leading to reproductive abnormalities. Some pesticides may even alter gene expression related to hormone regulation, causing long-term or transgenerational effects.

Heavy metals such as lead, mercury, and cadmium are also potent endocrine disruptors. These metals are present in industrial emissions, contaminated food and water, lead-based paints, and certain traditional medicines. They impair reproductive organs, lower fertility, and cause developmental issues in offspring. Despite widespread efforts to reduce their prevalence, they remain persistent in the environment.

Modern individuals face an overwhelming exposure to artificial chemicals that disrupt the endocrine system and negatively affect reproductive health. Human beings long evolved in environments free from artificial chemicals mimicking hormones, making today’s exposure unprecedented.

These disruptors can also significantly affect brain development and function. For instance, disruption of thyroid hormones during pregnancy may impair brain development, leading to cognitive impairments, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and autism spectrum disorder. Endocrine disruptors such as BPA and phthalates can alter the HPA axis, a system integral to stress responses, increasing susceptibility to anxiety and depression. Hormonal disruptions during critical development periods may even affect sexual behavior, preferences, and identity.

Since endocrine disruptors have profound consequences for reproductive health, lowering sperm count and motility, disrupting testosterone and other hormone levels, and interfering with ovulation and menstrual cycles, they lead to difficulties in conceiving, increased risks of miscarriage, preterm births, and lower birth rates. For these reproductive reasons, combined with their impacts on behavior and general health, endocrine disruptors represent a significant force working against the growth of humanity.

Pharmaceuticals

Pharmaceuticals are chemical or biological substances designed to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent diseases and medical conditions. They include prescription medications, over-the-counter drugs, generic and brand-name medications, and biologics—complex treatments derived from living organisms, such as vaccines, blood components, and gene therapies.

To understand pharmaceuticals fully, it is important to examine their development process. Potential therapeutic compounds are identified through extensive research and experimentation. These compounds undergo preclinical testing in laboratories and on animals to assess their safety and efficacy. Once deemed viable, they progress to human trials conducted in multiple phases to evaluate their safety, dosage, effectiveness, and potential side effects. Regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA), then review the clinical trial data to determine whether the drug can be approved for public use. Even after approval, pharmaceuticals are subject to continuous monitoring to ensure their long-term safety and efficacy.

Pharmaceuticals can impact humanity’s growth in several significant ways. One example that we already explored is birth control technologies, which are classified as a pharmaceutical. Additionally, various other pharmaceuticals are known to decrease fertility, either temporarily or permanently, as a side effect.

Antipsychotics, such as risperidone, can elevate prolactin levels, a hormone that inhibits ovulation in women and reduces libido and sperm production in men. Similarly, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), a common class of antidepressants, can negatively affect sperm quality and interfere with libido and sexual function, indirectly reducing fertility. Certain blood pressure medications, such as beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers, have also been linked to reduced fertility in men due to their effects on sperm production and motility. Moreover, medications like ACE inhibitors and diuretics can cause sexual dysfunction, such as erectile issues, further impacting fertility.

In addition to the fertility-decreasing drugs currently on the market, there have been numerous instances of pharmaceutical companies releasing drugs that have caused significant harm and fatalities. The OxyContin and opioid epidemic serves as one of the most prominent examples. Purdue Pharma, a pharmaceutical company, marketed OxyContin as a less addictive opioid due to its time-release formulation. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1995, OxyContin was promoted based on clinical trials demonstrating its effectiveness in pain management. Its widespread use contributed to the ongoing opioid crisis in the U.S., resulting in hundreds of thousands of overdose deaths involving prescription opioids since the late 1990s. Today, the opioid epidemic continues to devastate America, with tens of thousands of overdose fatalities annually.

Beyond the detrimental effects of drugs approved through a flawed pharmaceutical process, pharmaceuticals are linked to a range of economic issues. The pharmaceutical industry is deeply intertwined with the medical insurance system. Medical insurance—both private employer-sponsored plans and government-funded programs—significantly impact wages and take-home pay. Employers often offset the cost of providing health insurance by limiting potential wage increases. While employees receive health benefits, this “compensation trade-off” restricts salary growth. Research indicates that a substantial portion of employer spending on health insurance could have been allocated to higher wages instead [13].

Furthermore, U.S. workers contribute to Medicare through payroll taxes, which directly reduce take-home pay. These taxes fund health insurance for older adults and certain disabled individuals under Medicare. Health insurance premiums, however, have been rising at a rate outpacing wage growth for many years. Consequently, individuals are allocating an increasing share of their income to healthcare expenses, leaving less disposable income for other needs. This directly affects people’s ability to start and support families, detrimenting the birth rate. For all of these reasons, pharmaceuticals—both in their direct and indirect effects—can be viewed as a force working against the growth of humanity.

Non-Native EMF

Non-native electromagnetic fields (EMFs), also referred to as artificial or man-made EMFs, are generated by technologies such as power lines, mobile phones, Wi-Fi routers, and medical devices. Modern urban environments are saturated with non-native EMFs, an unprecedented phenomenon from an evolutionary standpoint. Humans did not evolve to thrive in an environment filled with such technologies. While these technologies are integral to modern life, ongoing scientific research has raised concerns about their negative biological effects.

To understand these effects, it is crucial to first categorize non-native EMFs based on their frequency. Low-frequency EMFs tend to be less disruptive to biological life, while high-frequency EMFs are generally more disruptive. Here is an overview of non-native EMFs by frequency:

Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) EMFs: Generated by power lines, electrical wiring, and household appliances (0–300 Hz).
Intermediate Frequency (IF) EMFs: Produced by devices like induction cooktops and anti-theft systems (300 Hz–10 MHz).
Radio Frequency (RF) EMFs: Emitted by mobile phones, Wi-Fi routers, and Bluetooth devices (10 MHz–300 GHz).
Microwave Radiation: Used in microwave ovens and radar systems (300 MHz–300 GHz).
Infrared Radiation: Found in remote controls and thermal imaging devices (300 GHz–430 THz).
Visible Light: Emitted by screens, LED lights, and fluorescent lighting (430 THz–770 THz).
Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation: Produced by sunbeds and sterilization lamps (770 THz–30 PHz).
X-Rays and Gamma Rays: Utilized in medical imaging and cancer treatment (above 30 PHz).

Modern technologies span the entire EMF spectrum, from extremely low-frequency power lines to high-frequency gamma rays. Devices generating EMFs are now commonplace, accompanying us everywhere we go. Developed and even developing areas are increasingly saturated with EMF-producing technologies.

Numerous studies suggest that EMFs of various frequencies pose threats to human health. Epidemiological research indicates a potential link between long-term ELF exposure and an increased risk of childhood leukemia [14] and in 2002, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified ELF magnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.” [15]. These fields, commonly generated by power lines and household appliances, can disrupt cellular processes like calcium signaling and stress protein expression, impairing cell function and communication.

In 2011, the IARC also classified RF EMFs as “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” citing evidence linking prolonged mobile phone use to glioma, a type of brain cancer [16]. The omnipresence of RF-emitting devices, such as mobile phones carried close to the body, raises concerns about long-term exposure.

While microwave radiation, UV rays, X-rays, and gamma rays are typically confined to specific technologies and applications, improper handling or overexposure can pose risks. For example, X-ray exposure during medical procedures is becoming more frequent, necessitating stringent safety measures. Workers in industries relying on such technologies face heightened risks.

Regardless of individual behavior, anyone living in the developed world is exposed to a diverse array of non-native EMFs. The cumulative effects of these exposures on human biology are likely significant. Over recent decades, there has been a notable increase in cancer incidence, prompting ongoing research into potential correlations with EMF exposure. Although these technologies are essential for modern life, their pervasive presence may disrupt biological processes crucial to human health and reproduction.

Non-native EMFs represent a bit of a paradox. While they are foundational to modern technology, their potential to harm biological systems suggests they are a force working against the growth of humanity. Understanding and mitigating these risks is vital for safeguarding continued growth.

Economic and Political Forces

Among the most powerful forces working agains the growth of humanity are economic and political forces. These forces exert immense influence on both death rates and birth rates, shaping the trajectory of societies. The following section will delve into the mechanisms through which economic and political forces contribute to these outcomes.

Centralized Control

Centralized control refers to a government or central authority making decisions that affect all of society, decisions that could otherwise be left to free market dynamics. Planned economies, central banks, price controls, surveillance systems, national curriculums, state-controlled media, and centralized tax agencies are all examples of centralized control mechanisms. Most, if not all of these have been implemented in the Western world in modern times.

Historical examples underscore the severe consequences of centrally planned decisions. For instance, China’s one-child policy—a decision made by central planners—led to a profound population crisis in China. Ordinarily, decisions about family size would be decentralized, with individuals making such choices independently. Another example occurred under Stalin’s Soviet Union where central planning lead to massive famines and political purges, leading to the deaths of tens of millions of people. Similarly, Mao Zedong’s policies in China, particularly the Great Leap Forward, caused tens of millions of deaths, primarily due to famine.

Centralized control remains a powerful force in the modern world. Most Western governments operate as mixed economies, balancing centralized decisions with market mechanisms. An example of a centralized decision in the West that has had a major impact on society is the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision—made by nine Supreme Court justices— which legalized abortion in the United States. This decision likely prevented an estimated sixty million births or more, based on abortion statistics since that time. Decisions like this highlight how centralized decisions can profoundly influence societal trends like birth rates. Given the ability of centrally planned decisions to result in catastrophic consequences, especially in the heavily globalized modern world, they are a force working against the growth of humanity.

Currency Manipulation

Currency manipulation is one of the most detrimental forces examined in this article. It refers to deliberate actions taken by a country or its central bank to influence the value of its national currency. Since the invention of currency, those in control of its supply have faced the temptation to manipulate it. The power to alter a nation’s currency supply is arguably too great for any individual or small group to wield.

Currency manipulation, often executed through increasing the supply of a currency, leads to currency devaluation, making it harder for people to achieve financial stability. Inflation (a general increase in prices and fall in the purchasing value of money) due to unsustainable government spending and currency manipulation has been a recurring issue throughout human history and continues to this day. The United States, which currently wields the global reserve currency, has significantly increased government spending and the supply of dollars over the past century. When mismanagement by central powers occurs, currency loses its value over time, deeply affecting the economy and everyone who is a part of it.

For most individuals, earning money involves trading their time and labor. Devaluing the currency they work for effectively devalues their time, their most precious resource. This devaluation of human time directly impacts birth rates, as one of the most commonly cited reasons for not having children is the high cost of raising them. Recently in the United States, inflation has driven up the costs of essential goods and services—from food and housing to education and healthcare—making it increasingly difficult for families to provide for their children. These rising costs often lead families to delay or forgo having children altogether.

Given its profound effects on the ability of individuals to raise children and sustain their livelihoods, currency manipulation stands out as one of the most significant forces working against the growth of humanity.

Censorship

Censorship refers to the suppression, restriction, or control of information by governments, institutions, private organizations, or individuals. This discussion will primarily focus on governmental censorship, as it is often the most detrimental and insidious form. Censorship has been a feature of civilizations since ancient times. Historical examples include the Qin Dynasty and the Roman Empire, where governments censored literature to suppress intellectual dissent, targeting books as the primary medium for exchanging complex ideas and information.

In the Medieval period, religious authorities, often intertwined with governmental powers, established extensive systems to censor literature deemed heretical or immoral. This stifled the generation of new knowledge for hundreds of years. More recently, the 20th century saw totalitarian regimes, such as Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and Maoist China, engage in mass censorship and propaganda, taking complete control over the media to manipulate public perception and suppress dissent.

Even in modern democratic nations, governmental censorship persists. In the United States, laws like the Comstock Laws (1873) and the Espionage Act (1917) were used to suppress information arguably protected by the First Amendment. In Canada and other Western countries, governments censor content they classify as “hate speech,” a term often criticized for its vagueness, granting authorities significant discretion to suppress narratives counter to their agendas. A very recent example of governmental censorship was the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story by the social media company Twitter in 2020, allegedly influenced by U.S. government pressure.

Even in nations celebrated for their commitment to freedom of speech, like the United States, governmental involvement in censorship demonstrates the persistent temptation for authorities to control information when it serves their interests. This highlights the ongoing threat censorship poses to transparency and democracy.

Censorship is a force that actively works against the growth of humanity for several reasons. Governmental censorship undermines both republicanism and democracy, systems that are fundamental to humanity’s progress. In Republics and Democracies, citizens rely on access to accurate and comprehensive information to make informed decisions about voting and participation in capitalistic markets. When governments censor information, they obstruct this process, impairing the public’s ability to make decisions that serve their interests.

The information that governments choose to censor is seldom random. They often suppress information that could threaten their grip on power or expose their mistakes and misconduct. This deliberate obfuscation shields governments from accountability and resistance, a tactic employed throughout history and continuing today.

Censorship is also deeply antagonistic to scientific innovation and the advancement of knowledge because these endeavors depend on the free exchange of diverse ideas and information. By restricting this exchange, governments stifle the potential for groundbreaking discoveries that benefit humanity. Concurrently, censorship empowers bad actors who thrive on deception and misinformation. For example, war hawks and warmongers have historically leveraged censorship and propaganda to garner support for conflicts, often with devastating consequences. Even in recent times, governmental censorship has played a role in enabling wars that result in widespread suffering.

The mass censorship enacted by totalitarian regimes in the 20th century directly contributed to actions that led to the deaths of hundreds of millions of people. By consolidating power among a small elite, censorship degrades democratic systems, weakens free markets, and disrupts individuals’ ability to make choices that benefit themselves and their families. For all these reasons, governmental censorship stands as a significant force working against the growth of humanity.

Forever Wars and Proxy Wars

A forever war refers to a prolonged and seemingly endless military conflict with no clear resolution or endpoint. The original goals of the conflict often become unclear or evolve over time, making it difficult to define what “victory” or “success” looks like. The United States began engaging in forever wars in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. A prime example of one of these forever wars is the war on terror. This abstract war was initiated in response to the attacks on 9/11. It includes ongoing U.S. military activities across several countries, such as drone strikes and special operations in places like Yemen, Somalia, and Pakistan. The war has led to hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of deaths with no clear end in sight.

Forever wars also play a massive role in the manipulation of currency, as governments often increase the currency supply to fund wars. The United States has undoubtedly done this, in part, to fund the war on terror. Since it began in 2001, they have spent an estimated eight trillion dollars on the War on Terror. According to the Costs of War Project, the U.S. government has borrowed around $2 trillion to cover war-related costs, significantly contributing to the national debt [17]. Borrowing creates future obligations in the form of interest payments, which continue to add to the overall cost. These are just a few of the many detrimental effects of forever wars.

A proxy war is a conflict where two or more major powers indirectly fight each other by supporting opposing sides in a third-party country, rather than engaging in direct, open warfare. In a proxy war, the external powers provide financial, military, or logistical support to their chosen side while avoiding direct military engagement to prevent a larger or more catastrophic conflict.

The United States began engaging in proxy wars in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. The most current example of a United States-funded proxy war is the war in Ukraine. As of early 2024, the United States has committed approximately $175 billion in total aid to Ukraine since the beginning of its war with Russia [18]. Since the U.S. is borrowing to finance not only Ukraine aid but also other government expenditures, a significant portion of the $175 billion is likely inflationary in nature.

Proxy wars act as a loophole that allows governments to engage in military conflicts without requiring public approval. Unlike direct military engagements, proxy wars avoid the backlash of sending a nation’s own civilians into battle. Instead, governments fund foreign countries to do the majority of the fighting, maintaining favorable public perception at home.

Forever wars and Proxy wars are forces working against the growth of humanity because they lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of civilians and combatants. Simultaneously, they defraud the populations of the countries involved through taxation and inflation, severely inhibiting the ability of average citizens to start families and contribute to humanity’s growth. Additionally, they devastate essential infrastructure, disrupt global trade, devalue currencies, reduce prosperity, and enrich bad actors who profit from the conflicts. Forever wars and proxy wars are undoubtedly forces working against the growth of humanity.

Centralized Education

The significant increase in government involvement in both lower and higher-level education over the past century has had profound effects on the growth of humanity, particularly in the United States. The gradual centralization of education has shifted control from local authorities to greater federal and state oversight. Initially, U.S. education was primarily managed at the local level, with school boards making decisions about curriculum, standards, and operations. However, the progressive movement introduced reforms aimed at standardizing curricula and teacher training. By 1918, all U.S. states had enacted compulsory education laws, mandating attendance for children and creating a uniform approach to education.

The establishment of the U.S. Department of Education in 1979 under President Jimmy Carter further centralized control. In 2001, President George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act mandated standardized testing and accountability measures tied to federal funding, solidifying federal influence over education. These developments exemplify the progressive centralization of education, concentrating control over children’s education in government hands.

Centralized education systems often stifle innovation and the generation of new knowledge by enforcing standardized curricula and rigid structures that prioritize conformity over creativity. These systems emphasize rote memorization, uniform testing, and adherence to predefined frameworks, leaving little room for critical thinking, exploration, and interdisciplinary approaches. By treating students as passive recipients of information rather than active participants in the learning process, centralized education discourages questioning, experimentation, and risk-taking—key drivers of innovation. Furthermore, centralized control limits the diversity of ideas by marginalizing alternative perspectives and nontraditional methodologies, thereby narrowing the intellectual landscape.

Centralized education systems often prioritize higher education, leading individuals to pursue longer academic careers. This delays workforce entry, economic stability, marriage, and childbearing. The emphasis on individual achievement and career development encourages many—especially women—to prioritize professional success over starting families. Consequently, women pursuing higher education and advanced degrees often delay childbirth, contributing to reduced fertility rates.

Student loans further exacerbate the issue by creating financial burdens that deter family formation. The government-driven student loan system has resulted in significant debt, forcing individuals to prioritize repayment over milestones like marriage and parenthood. As of 2023, U.S. student loan debt exceeds $1.7 trillion, with over 43 million Americans impacted [19]. A 2021 survey by the National Association of Realtors reported that 60% of non-home-owning millennials cited student loan debt as a reason for delaying homeownership—a critical step in family planning. Without the financial security of owning a home, many feel unprepared to have children.

The tendency for centralized education to stifle knowledge creation and drastically delay the formation of families makes it a clear force working against the growth of humanity.

Conclusion

After examining the various forces working against humanity’s growth, a clearer picture of their interconnectedness emerges. These forces reinforce one another in ways that discourage the creation of new knowledge and new life. They disrupt and suppress the natural biological drives of both males and females, hinder the free flow of information and knowledge, and propagate ideologies that are fundamentally anti-human, incentivizing individuals to take actions that oppose the growth of humanity.

These forces also undermine financial stability, extracting wealth from individuals during their reproductive years, and making it harder for people to start families and support children. They degrade individual health, potentially extending lifespans, but not necessarily enhancing the quality of life. Additionally, many individuals now spend their prime reproductive years in school, accumulating debt and being influenced by ideologies that discourage family creation.

These combined forces are incredibly powerful, especially when acting in unison. It is vital to recognize and counteract them. Only through open discussion and heightened awareness can individuals make informed decisions to build healthy families and ensure the continued growth of humanity.

FOOTNOTES:

One response to “Forces Working Against the Growth of Humanity”

Forces Working For the Growth of Humanity – Matthew Frasetto

January 20, 2025 at 8:20 pm

[…] is a sequel to my previous article that dove into the forces working against the growth of humanity. As defined in my previous […]

Loading…